Make AI-built internal tools safe for company use.
A hands-on review from the Unwrap team of the tools your teams have built in Cursor, Claude Code and Replit — to determine which become official, maintained company software, and under what controls.
Who this is for: operators, finance and people leads, internal IT/security teams, and founders running teams where internal tools are already in use.
The build barrier is gone. The adoption barrier is not.
Your teams can ship a working internal tool in a day. Standing it up for company-wide use is a separate problem: access, data exposure, ownership and maintenance all remain unresolved. Left alone, useful tools either get blocked before they prove their worth — or spread through the business with no controls attached.
The cost is twofold: risk, and wasted software.
Subscriptions persist because internally built replacements are never formally trusted.
Tools that solve real problems stall as unofficial, with no route to approval.
Tools in daily use, with no access controls or owner, transfer risk to the company.
Managers have no defensible standard for authorising wider use.
Engaged where internal tools are already in use.
Typically when staff, contractors or agencies have already built tooling around process gaps — and the business needs a decision on each one.
We run this with you personally: workshops, review calls and direct recommendations from our team.
A structured review of every tool, ending in one decision.
Each tool is assessed as a company asset across five areas. The output is a single recommendation per tool, with the reasoning recorded.
Identify every internally built tool, dashboard and automation in use or proposed — including undocumented ones.
Establish what each tool replaces, who relies on it, and its effect on SaaS and manual cost.
Map the data each tool reads and writes, and define who should hold access.
Assign an owner, backup, review cadence and support route for each retained tool.
Issue one verdict per tool: approve, restrict, improve, replace with SaaS, or retire.
What the review delivers.
Retain what is good enough rather than buying another subscription.
Tools widen only once access, data and maintenance are settled.
Managers can authorise, decline, or defer on consistent grounds.
No tool depends on whoever happened to build it.
Informal links replaced by a controlled path to use.
Each subsequent tool follows the same route.
The review is delivered hands-on by us, in person with your team. The same process is being built into Unwrap — software for submitting, reviewing and maintaining internal tools — but this service engagement comes first, and we stay involved as long as you need it.